Saqqara is best known for the Step Pyramid of Djoser (3rd Dynasty), but parts of the plateau also hide earlier royal funerary architecture. In the early 2nd Dynasty, several kings are widely linked to large subterranean “gallery tombs” at North Saqqara—underground corridors and storage chambers cut into the bedrock, with few (or no) surviving superstructures. This page explains what the gallery tombs are, how they are attributed (sealings, context, and debate), and how to understand them when you visit Saqqara today.
Note: the plan on this page is a simplified, not‑to‑scale diagram for orientation. For measured plans and excavation reports, use the publications in the Sources section.
Background photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0) — “Saqqara, step pyramid of Djoser (6201557496)”.
The “Gallery Tomb” labels (A, B…) are conventional modern names for major underground complexes at North Saqqara. Attributions to specific kings rely mainly on archaeological context and seal impressions, and some details remain debated.
A fast orientation: where these tombs are, who they’re linked to, and what makes them important.
North Saqqara, part of the wider Memphis necropolis south of Cairo. The gallery tombs are underground and lie in areas later reused by monuments such as the Unas and Djoser complexes.
Early 2nd Dynasty (Early Dynastic Period, roughly late 3rd millennium BCE). This is the era between the royal cemetery at Abydos (1st Dynasty) and the rise of stone pyramid complexes (3rd Dynasty).
Subterranean galleries: long corridors with many side chambers. Think “underground storerooms” for funerary equipment, cut into bedrock, with entrances that could be blocked and concealed.
Most commonly attributed to Hotepsekhemwy and/or Raneb (Nebra) (Gallery Tomb A), and Ninetjer (Gallery Tomb B). Attributions are based mainly on seal impressions and contextual evidence.
The Saqqara gallery tombs show a major experiment in royal burial architecture: kings could create vast underground storage systems without the huge above‑ground footprints that later pyramid complexes made famous. They also reflect shifting political and religious geography—early 2nd Dynasty royal activity is strongly tied to the Memphis region, while some later 2nd Dynasty rulers were buried again at Abydos.
These underground galleries are not usually open as a standalone attraction. When you visit Saqqara, you’re mostly seeing later surface monuments—but understanding the hidden Early Dynastic layers gives the plateau a completely different depth.
Use the tabs to navigate the article quickly.
In the early 2nd Dynasty, North Saqqara gained a set of large underground funerary complexes usually called gallery tombs. Unlike the mud‑brick mastaba superstructures that dominate 1st‑Dynasty elite cemeteries, these were primarily subterranean systems—long corridors and dozens (sometimes hundreds) of side chambers. The chambers likely stored funerary equipment, provisions, and ritual items, while access routes could be sealed and obscured.
Archaeologists commonly distinguish Gallery Tomb A (often linked to Hotepsekhemwy and/or Raneb) and Gallery Tomb B (often linked to Ninetjer). Because the complexes were later disturbed, attributions rely on a combination of seal impressions, stratigraphy, and the broader landscape history of North Saqqara. A key synthesis is provided by C. D. Reader’s discussion of North Saqqara’s Early Dynastic ritual landscape.
Saqqara is the necropolis of Memphis, the power center of early pharaonic Egypt. During the 1st Dynasty, royal burials were concentrated at Abydos, but the Memphis region hosted major elite cemeteries. In the 2nd Dynasty, some royal burial activity appears to move into the Saqqara landscape in the form of extensive underground galleries. Later in the 2nd Dynasty, royal burials are again attested at Abydos for rulers such as Peribsen and Khasekhemwy, showing that the geography of royal mortuary practice was not fixed.
The gallery tombs are best understood as engineered underground landscapes. They usually begin with a descending entrance corridor, followed by a central passage with multiple side galleries. The intent was likely to create a secure space for burial and an enormous quantity of funerary goods. Because later digging, collapse, and reuse affect the remains, publications may differ slightly on reconstructions and measurements.
Attribution is discussed in landscape syntheses and Early Dynastic architectural studies; see Sources.
For plans and discussion, see open references that include diagrams of the tombs and their corridors.
Plans are built from excavation trenches, mapped corridors, and carefully recorded chamber sequences. In areas where the galleries lie beneath later monuments, access can be limited, and old exploration notes may have to be checked against modern survey and excavation. That is why modern publications sometimes correct or refine earlier “clean” plans that were produced from partial access.
Because these complexes were heavily disturbed, the most informative finds are often those that can be tied to secure contexts: seal impressions, diagnostic pottery, and object groups that clearly belong to Early Dynastic funerary provisioning. Some key categories recur in reports and syntheses:
Clay sealings can preserve royal names, estate names, and administrative titles. When sealings of a particular king are found in a gallery complex, scholars weigh whether they indicate ownership, reuse, or ritual deposition. In North Saqqara, seal evidence is central to attributing Gallery Tomb A and B to early 2nd Dynasty rulers.
Reports frequently mention large quantities of jars (wine/beer), stone vessels, and storage containers. Even when robbed, patterns of vessel types and deposits help reconstruct how royal burial provisioning was organized during the Early Dynastic period.
North Saqqara has a long history of exploration, loss, rediscovery, and modern re‑excavation. Contemporary missions (including the long-running Leiden work in Saqqara) continue to clarify Early Dynastic layers beneath later New Kingdom and Late Period structures.
Main debates include exact attribution, the degree to which layouts were intentionally “palace‑like,” and how the Saqqara royal burials relate to Abydos traditions. Good practice is to cite excavation reports and modern syntheses rather than relying on a single secondary summary.
Even though the 2nd‑Dynasty gallery tombs are underground and not typically accessible, you can still “read” their presence in the landscape when you explore Saqqara. The plateau is layered: Early Dynastic burials, Old Kingdom pyramids, later shafts, monasteries, and modern excavations.
In short: North Saqqara, in areas that were reused and built over in later periods. Many descriptions place the main gallery complexes beneath or near later features associated with the Unas area and the Step Pyramid zone. Because these are archaeological rather than tourist-visible features, your best “map” is still the published plans and excavation reports listed below.
Below are open online references and standard print works that discuss the Second Dynasty at Saqqara, the North Saqqara landscape, and the key gallery tomb complexes.
“Second Dynasty Royal Tombs at Saqqara (Gallery Tombs).” Egypt Lover, updated 2026-02-13. https://www.egyptlover.com/tomb-dynasty2-saqqara.html
Last updated: 2026-02-13
Rights note: This page is an original summary and commentary written for educational purposes. It links to third‑party resources and does not reproduce copyrighted book chapters. Where images are used, we prefer open licenses and provide source links.
Common questions about the Second Dynasty gallery tombs at Saqqara.